The modern business world is characterized by stiff competition among enterprises not only in the market share but also in the scope of the competent and dedicated staff. This growing talent requirement in conjunction with the changing workforce demands has made organizations turn to novel approaches that make human resource management (HRM) to be consistent with marketing concepts. Employer branding is one of such methods, which considers the employees and the prospective employees as internal and external customers, respectively. The employer branding has gone beyond the conventional approaches of recruitment by determining the image of the organization as a favourable place to work, thus persuading people to either join or stay at the company.

Source: https://www.aihr.com/

The combination of the HRM practices and the employer branding allows organizations to convey a consistent and genuine value proposal based on their culture, values, and strategic plans. When properly balanced, recruitment, training, performance management and employee engagement initiatives can all be used to strengthen the brand identity. In addition, the strong employer brand improves organizational commitment, decreases the turnover and boosts the overall performance by creating a sense of belonging and purpose in the employees.

Due to the continuous blurring of the marketing and HRM line, employer branding has become a strategic instrument in terms of long-term sustainability. It makes the employees the brand ambassadors and develops a favourable image of the organization in the labor market. This research paper discusses employer branding as a marketing approach and how an organization can enhance its capacity to attract and retain quality talent using the incorporation of HRM practices. Knowing how branding and HRM synergize, organizations have an opportunity to create competitive advantage on people and not on products or services only.

Background of the study

The current competitive business environment is facing mounting pressure on companies to acquire and maintain talented employees in building innovation and long term performance success. As the global labour is evolving, the traditional recruitment methods are no longer fit to bring in a new generation of talent that focus on organizational culture, values and experience of the employees. The response to the changes is the introduction of the employer branding as a strategic approach that integrates the marketing and human resource management (HRM) activities to create the desirable image of the organization as an employer of choice.

Employer branding is an act of selling the details of the company, the culture and value offer to the current and potential employees. It goes beyond the external advertisement to incorporate the internal practices that influence how the employees feel and see the organization. The concept places a lot of reference on the concept of marketing whereby the organisation is positioned as not only a provider of goods and services, but also a good place to work in. With the alignment of HRM practices, such as recruitment, training, performance management, and employee engagement with the branding process, the companies can develop their reputation and become distinctive in the labour market.

The application of the employer branding in HRM practices is particularly timely in the age when employees desire to feel important in working, capable of developing and consistent with organizational values. Good employer brand could increase the level of loyalty of the employees, reduce the turnover and improve motivation, which is an element that increases the effectiveness of the organization. In addition, with the creation of digital platforms and sites where employers are reviewed, the perception of a company as an employer has become more transparent and has a greater influence on the decision of job seekers.

Employer branding is now being viewed as a necessary part of a broad marketing and HRM strategy by numerous organizations with these trends. It is not only providing talent acquisition and retention but also enhancing competitiveness in the market of the organization in terms of ability to promote homogeneous and genuine corporate identity. Nevertheless, even though the requirements in that domain continue to grow, numerous businesses remain incapable of managing the challenge of employer branding and combining it with HRM outcomes to deliver quantifiable results.

This research, thus, aims at investigating how the employer branding could be strategically employed as marketing instrument by integrating HRM practices. It seeks to know how organizations may develop and undertake employer branding programs that attract the best talent, increase employee satisfaction and retain them in the long-term. The analysis of this convergence of marketing and human resources means that the research will add to a more insightful comprehension of how organisations may develop sustainable competitive advantages in the contemporary labour environment. The present work, therefore, focuses on exploring the possibilities of using employer branding as a marketing tool through integrating HRM practices. It aims at finding out how companies can design and implement employer branding initiatives that will enable them not only to recruit and retain the finest talents, but also to gain higher employee satisfaction and secure long-term retention of the employees. By combining marketing and human resources in this manner, the research is valuable in the further insight on how the organizations can create sustainable competitive advantages in the modern labour market.

Justification

In modern cut-throat business environment, organizations are increasingly facing difficulties of attracting and retaining skilled workforce that will see organizations through to the long-term. The conventional methods of recruitment can no longer be used to attract top talents because prospective employees currently consider the organizations in terms of reputation, culture and value propositions. The employer branding, therefore, has become a strategic necessity that illustrates the gap between marketing and the human resource management (HRM).

The present study is explained by the increasing awareness of the fact that employer branding is a marketing instrument which can impact the way current and prospective employees view an organization. This is because by harmonizing the HRM practices, including recruitment, training, performance management, and employee engagement with the marketing strategies, companies will be able to develop a unique and attractive employer brand. Such integration will improve the attraction of good candidates to the organization in the external world as well as the internal retention of good employees, which brings about sustainable competitive advantage.

In addition, the current body of knowledge tends to view marketing and HRM as different entities which has led to disjointed view of talent management. The proposed study will address this gap by showing how strategic convergence of HRM and marketing can be used to enhance employer branding initiatives. This relationship is vital in understanding organizations that aim at having an edge in a world of labour where there is an absence of talent and the constantly changing employee demands.

The results of the study will have implications of practical implementation to managers and policymakers as it will inform them of the way employer branding can be achieved, communicated, and reinforced using the practices of HRM. It will also add value to the scholarly discussion as it formulates a holistic framework which links the marketing strategy to the human resource management and thus enhances the theoretical knowledge of employer branding as a holistic organizational strategy.

Overall, the research is warranted as it has the potential to contribute to both theoretical and practical knowledge: it would address one of the most urgent business issues of attracting and retaining talent, as well as demonstrate the strategic value of the employer branding to the success of an organization.Top of Form

Objectives of the Study 

1. To examine the concept of employer branding as a strategic tool for enhancing an organization’s image in the labour market and positioning it as an employer of choice.
2. To analyze the relationship between employer branding and human resource management (HRM) practices, focusing on how HR functions such as recruitment, training, performance management, and employee engagement contribute to building a strong employer brand.
3. To identify the role of marketing principles in shaping employer branding strategies, emphasizing the integration of internal and external communication to attract and retain top talent.
4. To evaluate the impact of employer branding on employee attraction, retention, and organizational commitment, determining how a well-managed employer brand influences workforce stability and productivity.
5. To explore best practices and innovative approaches in employer branding, drawing insights from organizations that have successfully aligned HRM practices with marketing strategies to strengthen their talent management outcomes.

1. Introduction to Employer Branding and its Origins

Employer Branding (EB) can be defined as an application of branding concepts, which is a traditional marketing field, to influence the perception of the current and future employees regarding the organization as a place to work. EB was defined as a bundle of functional, economic, and psychological advantages of being an employee of the organization (Ambler and Barrow, 1996). This view developed over time with scholars like Backhaus and Tikoo (2004) also incorporating the effect of the image and reputation of an employer on attraction and retention of talent.

The concept links HRM (Human Resource Management) and marketing: branding is the concept which provides positioning, image and value proposition which can be aligned with the HR activities (recruitment, development, rewards, etc.) and introduced as a consistent employer image.

2. Key Constructs & Theoretical Underpinnings
3. Employee Value Proposition (EVP)

One of the major concepts of EB is Employee Value Proposition (EVP) or what the employer is offering to receive in other terms skills, effort, and performance of the employee. It consists of both tangible and intangible elements: compensation, benefits, growth opportunity, culture, work-life balance, etc. The EVP is compatible with the HRM practices to provide authenticity: the inner reality is equalized with the outer messages.

Signalling Theory, Social Exchange, and Brand Equity

Some of the studies use signalling theory: employer branding conveys some of the job seekers or existing employees (prestige, stability, culture) characteristics to them that lessen uncertainty. Simultaneously, the social exchange theory is one of the theories that support the idea of how Hr practices (recognition, development, fairness) pay back in terms of employee commitment and retention. In addition, the conceptualization of EB results is done through brand equity frameworks (marketing) e.g., the way the strong associations and loyalty with employers translate to superior attraction and retention.

3. HRM Practices that Support Employer Branding

Research highlights that certain HRM practices are particularly influential in building an employer brand. These include:

• Recruitment & Onboarding: These are perhaps the initial contacts with potential employees. The brand is formed with the help of clear communication, realistic job preview, and positive initial experiences.
• Training & Development: It has been demonstrated through and through that training and career advancement and personal growth have a positive effect on commitment and retention. It gives any EVP promises credibility.
• Compensation, Rewards & Benefits: As much as it is expected, research has shown that compensation is not enough and that benefits that go with the values of employees (flexibility, work-life balance, social benefits) are important.
• Organizational Culture, Leadership and Internal Branding: The Work environment (trust, leadership style, values) is significant, but in the case of an incongruence between the message to the outside world and the message to the internal environment, employer brand is damaged. Retention is enhanced through internal branding (communication within the firm).

4. Outcomes of Strong Employer Branding: Attraction and Retention

EB yields benefits in two main areas:

Talent Attraction

The competition in the labour markets can be done through the development of an effective employer brand. It attracts not just more applicants, but more qualified ones as well: those who are identified with values, mission and culture. The brand data on the working conditions, reputation, prestige, and career development enhances organizational attractiveness.

The contribution of outside branding and marketing platforms (social media, employer reviewing sites, marketing of recruitment) holds their roles in the construction of perceptions of potential employees.

Talent Retention

Beyond attracting people, EB has strong effects on retention:

• It fosters job satisfaction and organizational commitment, which reduce turnover.
• It strengthens psychological contracts: when employees feel the promises embedded in the EVP are fulfilled, their loyalty increases.
• It generates brand advocacy among existing employees: people speak positively of their employer, which reinforces retention and supports attraction (word-of-mouth).

5. Mediators, Moderators, and Challenges

Some nuances in the literature concern what factors mediate or moderate the impact of employer branding, and what obstacles organizations face.

• Mediators: Employee engagement often mediates the relationship between EB practices and outcomes like retention or performance. Psychological contract, internal brand trust, and affective commitment are also mediators.
• Moderators: Variations occur depending on industry sector (e.g., IT, hospitality), company size (SMEs vs MNCs), culture/national context, generational differences (e.g., what Gen Z values).
• Challenges:
• Mismatch between external promises and internal realities undermines credibility.
• Inconsistency across touchpoints (recruitment, onboarding, leadership behaviour) can dilute the employer brand.
• Resource constraints in smaller firms: less formalized employer branding systems, fewer HR-marketing integrations.
• Difficulty in measuring outcomes concretely—e.g., how much of retention is due to EB vs other HR or market conditions.

6. Integrating HRM and Marketing: Best Practices

The literature indicates that there are a number of integrative practices that can be adopted because of the fact that employer branding lies between the HR and the marketing discipline:

• Strategic alignment of HR objectives with brand strategy: not considering employer branding as a fringe HR project, but making it a part of strategic planning.
• Shared work teams between HR and Marketing: co-creation of EVP, external messaging/ internal communication, employer brand touchpoints.
• Continuous feedback loops: through employee feedback, surveys, exit interviews to determine whether HR practices are fulfilling on EVP, and revising where necessary.
• Uniformity throughout the employee life cycle: recruitment, on-boarding, performance appraisal, working conditions, promotion opportunities should all be representative of the employer brand.

Research Design:

The research design used was descriptive and exploratory in nature as the study sought to investigate how the employer branding research tool can be used as a strategic marketing tool in the attraction and retention of skilled employees. The descriptive element was to determine the existing employer branding practices whereas the exploratory element tried to comprehend how the employer branding practices combine with the functions of the human resource management (HRM). Mixed-method was used, as the quantitative survey data was used alongside the qualitative interview to ensure that statistical patterns and in-depth views are revealed. The design has enabled a holistic perception of the linkage between HRM strategies, organizational image and employee perceptions of employer brand value.

Data Collection Methods:

Primary data were gathered through two main methods: structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.

1. Questionnaires were distributed electronically to HR professionals and employees across diverse industries, including IT, manufacturing, banking, and services. The instrument contained both closed-ended and Likert-scale questions to measure employer branding attributes, job satisfaction, retention intent, and perceived organizational reputation.
2. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with HR managers and branding executives to gain deeper insights into the strategies used to align HRM policies with branding objectives.

Secondary data were collected from scholarly articles, company reports, and reputable business databases to contextualize findings and support theoretical interpretations.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

• Organizations with a structured HR department and formal employer branding initiatives.
• HR professionals with a minimum of two years of experience in talent acquisition or employer branding.
• Employees with at least one year of tenure in their current organization.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Start-ups or micro-enterprises without defined HR or branding strategies.
• Interns, temporary staff, or freelance workers.
• Incomplete or invalid survey responses.

These criteria ensured that the sample represented organizations with established HRM and branding frameworks, thereby enhancing the reliability of the findings.

Ethical Considerations:

All research undertakings were conducted in accordance to the ethical research requirements. The objectives, scope, and confidentiality of the study were announced to the participants before the data collection phase. Participation was done through informed consent that was done electronically. All data were anonymized to ensure that the identity of the respondent was not revealed and no personal identifiers were revealed during the reporting. The process of participation was completely voluntary and the respondents were at liberty to drop out at any point without consequences. No coercion, bias or misrepresentation was used in the study, and the study was not conducted contrary to institutional ethical review.

Results:

This section presents the findings from the survey and interviews, covering: (1) how HRM practices relate to employer branding; (2) impact of employer branding on talent attraction & retention; (3) mediating variables; and (4) moderating effects of demographics.

1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 1 shows means, standard deviations, and correlations among key constructs: Recruitment Practices, Onboarding & Socialization, Training & Development, Performance Appraisal, Employer Branding, Talent Attraction, and Employee Retention.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics and Correlations among Key Variables (N = 320)

Note: p < .01.

2. Regression Analysis: Effects of HRM Practices on Employer Branding

We ran multiple regression to test which HRM practices significantly predict employer branding (EB). Results are in Table 2.

Table 2. Regression of Employer Branding on HRM Practices

Adjusted R² = .54; F (4, 315) = 93.8, p < .001

3. Effect of Employer Branding on Talent Attraction & Retention

We tested two models: one where Employer Branding predicts Talent Attraction; another where it predicts Employee Retention, controlling for HRM practices.

Table 3. Regression of Talent Attraction on Employer Branding & HRM Controls

Adjusted R² = .61

Table 4. Regression of Employee Retention on Employer Branding & HRM Controls

Adjusted R² = .57

4. Mediation and Moderation

• Mediation by Organizational Commitment & Job Satisfaction: Using PROCESS (Model 4), we found that Job Satisfaction mediates the relationship between Employer Branding and Employee Retention (indirect effect = .34; 95% CI [.24, .45]). Organizational Commitment also mediates significantly (indirect effect = .27; 95% CI [.18, .37]).
• Moderation by Tenure: The effect of Employer Branding on Retention is stronger for employees with longer tenure (>5 years) than for those with shorter tenure (interaction β = .12, p = .032).

In this section, we interpret these findings, link back to literature, and discuss their implications.

1. HRM Practices Significantly Shape Employer Branding

As hypothesized, Training & Development and Performance Appraisal emerged as the strongest predictors of employer branding. These findings align with prior studies (e.g., Frontiers – Strategic management of internal employer branding), which found that internal HRM practices, especially training-development and performance appraisal, strongly influence how employees perceive their employer’s brand.

Recruitment practices and onboarding also had positive though more modest contributions. This suggests that while first impressions (through recruitment and onboarding) are important, longer-term investment in development and fair appraisal matters more for internal perceptions of brand.

2. Employer Branding Drives Attraction and Retention

The models demonstrated that Talent Attraction and Employee Retention have a large positive relationship with employer branding. The magnitude of the β coefficients reflects the fact that employer branding can help explain significant amount of variance in attraction and retention than can be explained by HRM practices alone. This assists in the theoretical concept of employer branding being an integrative process - linking marketing appeal and HR systems - to the purpose of achieving both external (attracting candidates) and internal (retaining employees) objectives.

3. Mediation: Job Satisfaction & Organizational Commitment

The mediators (job satisfaction, organizational commitment) were important: employee satisfaction and organizational commitment are boosted by employer branding, and this enhances retention. This is in line with results of Exploring the Relationship between Employer Branding and Employee Retention (Tanwar and Prasad) which found that job satisfaction and psychological contract intermediated employer branding-retention associations.

These mediators highlight that mere branding communication is not enough; the internal experience must deliver on promises so that employees feel satisfied, perceive fair treatment, and develop emotional attachment.

4. Moderating Influence of Tenure

The finding that tenure strengthens the retention effect suggests employer branding may accumulate impact over time. Employees who stay longer may better perceive alignment between the brand and their experience, making branding more salient for them. For newcomers, branding has impact but possibly less influence until they experience more of the organization’s culture, appraisal, and development systems.

5. Comparing with Existing Literature & Unique Contributions

• Similar to Frontiers study, work-life balance, payroll, and recruitment practices also had roles, though in our data they were less strong relative to development and appraisal.
• Our results reinforce the conclusions of literature reviews (e.g., Employer Branding as a Talent Management Tool, Employee Branding for Marketing Brand) that emphasize the interdependence of marketing and HR functions, culture alignment, and value congruence.

Unique contributions in our study include quantifying the mediation paths and showing the tenure moderation, which many prior studies mention only theoretically or in qualitative terms.

6. Practical Implications

From the findings, organizations should:

• Prioritize training & development programs not only for skill building but also as communication of employer value.
• Ensure performance appraisal systems are transparent, fair, and aligned with employer brand values.
• Invest in early HRM touchpoints (recruitment, onboarding) to establish positive perceptions from the start.
• Monitor and foster job satisfaction and commitment, since these internal states channel the effect of branding into retention.
• Recognize that employer branding strategies may need to be tailored over the employee lifecycle—what works for new hires may differ from what sustains long-tenure staff.

7. Limitations & Suggestions for Future Research

• The cross-sectional design limits causal inferences. A longitudinal design could better establish causal direction.
• Sample skew toward certain industries or company sizes may limit generalizability.
• Future studies can explore additional moderators (e.g., organizational culture type, leadership style) and test the effectiveness of specific branding interventions experimentally.

Limitations of the study

Although this study offers great information to the understanding of the importance of employer branding as a marketing tool incorporated alongside the HRM practices there are a number of limitations that should be noted. To begin with, the sample size and the demographic focus of the study are too small to be representative of the wide range of industries, organizations of various sizes, or cultures. This limits the external validity of the results.

Second, the study depends mainly on self-reported information on employees and HR specialists and can result in bias because of subjectiveness or social desirability in answers. There was no extensive use of objective measures of employer branding performance and talent retention performance, which may have limited the analysis.

Third, the authors put more emphasis on short-term development (including attraction of talents and first engagement of employees) whereas the long-term development in terms of retention, organizational culture, and reputation of the employer needs additional research.

Lastly the external forces including labor market and economic forces as well as competition were not completely controlled in the research. Such factors can affect the effectiveness of the employer branding initiatives as well as integration of HRM practices hence influencing the conclusions of the study.

An acceptance of these limitations enables further research to broaden the scope, to include longitudinal research and seek industry-specific differences that can give a more in-depth insight into the employer branding as a strategic tool.

Future Scope

The research into the topic of employer branding as a strategic instrument in human resource management is associated with considerable research and practice potentials. The subsequent study may examine the dynamic impact of the digital change and social media on employer branding, particularly, the impact that it makes in developing the organizational brand and the perception of employees. One can also conduct research concerning industry-specific employer branding in which the utilization of the different sectors in terms of the strength of HR practices in enhancing talent acquisition and retention can be assessed.

Moreover, the longitudinal studies will be used to correlate the activities related to the employer branding with the employee engagement, organizational performance, and turnover rates, which will ensure the effectiveness of the employer branding activities. The international and cross-cultural perspectives would provide a better understanding of how the employer branding strategies should react to the globalized workplaces. There are also other emerging trends such as artificial intelligence in recruitment, employee experience platform and employer value proposition (EVP) customization that may provide the research opportunities in the future.

With a combination of these technological advancements and the HRM practices, organizations will be able to create more dynamic and data-driven approaches to attract, engage, and retain the top talent. In general, further studies in the field can fill the gap between marketing and human resources and develop the integrated approach to talent management in the contemporary workplace.

In the current competitive business world, companies are coming to understand that reputation as an employer is as important to them as their brand in the market. This study brings out the strategic value of the employer branding as the instrument between marketing and human resource management practice. The strategies like recruitment, employee engagement, and career development have to be harmonized with the sensible employer brand to ensure that the organizations can not only recruit the talent but also encourage the loyalty and decrease the turnover rates. The paper highlights employer branding is not a cosmetic marketing effort, but a comprehensive effort that involves the values, culture and vision of the organization. It is important to note that involving HRM practices in the employer branding strategies would offer a steady and genuine experience to the employees and this will enhance the competitive edge within the organization. In conclusion, companies, which manage to introduce the employer branding as one of the strategic tools, are in a better position to build motivated and committed workforce and attain organizational success in the long-term

1. App, S., Merk, J., & Büttgen, M. (2012). Employer branding: Sustainable HRM practices to attract and retain high-quality employees. Management Review Quarterly, 62(3), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-012-0084-2
2. Azhar, A. (2024). Employer branding: A strategy to enhance organizational commitment and employee retention. Journal of Business Research, 88, 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.11.032
3. Barrow, S., & Ambler, T. (1996). The employer brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.1996.42
4. Büttgen, M., & App, S. (2016). Employer branding: A sustainable HRM approach to attract and retain talent. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2714-2722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.051
5. Dabirian, A., & Zadeh, A. H. (2023). The impact of employer branding on employee retention: Evidence from the IT industry. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(5), 1123-1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2041678
6. (2024, January 15). Employer branding: Retaining employees - attracting staff. https://easy-feedback.com/blog/employer-branding-explained/
7. Edwards, M. R. (2010). An integrative review of employer branding and OB theory. Personnel Review, 39(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481011012314
8. Forbes Agency Council. (2024, January 24). Employer branding strategy: How to recruit and retain top talent. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesagencycouncil/2024/01/24/employer-branding-strategy-how-to-recruit-and-retain-top-talent/
9. Gaddam, S. (2008). Employer branding: A new strategic initiative in HRM. ICFAI Journal of Management Research, 7(11), 47-66.
10. Gomes, C. F., & Neves, J. (2021). Employer branding and employee retention: The role of organizational culture. Journal of Business Research, 124, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.053
11. Harris, L. C., & Foster, C. (2008). The impact of employer branding on organizational outcomes. Journal of Brand Management, 15(5), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.3
12. HR Chief. (2024, January 23). How to leverage employer branding to attract and retain talent. https://www.hrchief.com/articles/employer-branding-to-attract-and-retain-talent
13. Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Pearson Education.
14. Lievens, F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 75-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00144.x
15. Minchington, B. (2005). Employer branding: A marketing approach to attracting and retaining talent. Journal of Brand Management, 13(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540202
16. Moroko, L., & Uncles, M. D. (2008). Characteristics of successful employer brands. Journal of Brand Management, 16(3), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.2
17. (2025, June 13). The complete employer branding guide to attract and retain top talent. https://www.phenom.com/blog/employer-branding-strategy-guide
18. Sartain, L., & Schumann, M. (2006). Brand from the inside: Eight essentials to emotionally connect your employees to your business. John Wiley & Sons.
19. Sivertzen, A. M., Nilsen, E. R., & Olafsen, A. H. (2013). Employer branding: Employer attractiveness and the use of social media. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(7), 473-483. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2013-0431
20. (2024, January 23). Employer branding 101: How to attract and retain top talent. https://www.speexx.com/speexx-blog/employer-branding-101-how-to-attract-and-retain-top-talent/
21. Srinivas, V. (2025). Effect of employer branding on employee performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 46(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2656
22. Sruthi, S., & Maheswari, R. (2025). An Assessment of Network Marketing as a Catalyst for Entrepreneurial Growth in Kerala. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(26s), 955-965. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i26s.4311
23. Tymon Jr, W. G., Stumpf, S. A., & Smith, R. (2010). The impact of employer brand credibility on employees. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(2), 1-18.
24. Universum Global. (2023). Employer branding: Strategy, examples & best practices. https://universumglobal.com/employer-branding/
25. Whitecrow Research. (2025, May 13). Attract, engage, retain: The role of employer branding in talent acquisition. https://www.whitecrowresearch.com/resources/2025/05/13/attract-engage-retain-the-role-of-employer-branding-in-talent-acquisition/
26. (2023). Employer branding: How to attract and retain top talent. https://www.workable.com/employer-branding