This research explores financial planning behaviors and investment preferences among individuals residing in the coastal districts of East Godavari and West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh, India. Using a sample of 170 respondents, the study employs statistical tools such as descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and ANOVA to understand the demographic influence and preference patterns for various investment avenues including fixed deposits, mutual funds, real estate, stocks, and insurance. The findings suggest significant demographic impacts on investment preferences, with a growing inclination towards mutual funds and insurance among younger investors.
Investment planning is a crucial aspect of personal finance, especially in growing economies like India. East Godavari and West Godavari districts, with their blend of urban and rural populations, provide a unique setting to examine financial behavior. This study aims to fill the gap in understanding regional investment trends and decision-making processes.
Financial planning is a crucial component of individual economic well-being, enabling people to allocate resources wisely, prepare for future needs, and achieve long-term financial security. It involves evaluating income, expenses, savings, and investments to meet personal and family goals. In today’s dynamic financial environment, individuals are faced with a growing array of investment options ranging from traditional avenues like bank deposits and insurance policies to modern instruments like mutual funds, equities, real estate, and digital assets.
The Indian financial market has evolved significantly over the past two decades with increasing awareness, technology-driven platforms, and regulatory reforms. However, the investment behavior of individuals is not uniform across regions and is often influenced by socio-demographic factors such as age, gender, education level, income, and occupation. In less urbanized or semi-urban districts, such as East Godavari and West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh, traditional beliefs, limited access to financial education, and risk aversion often guide financial decisions.
These coastal districts, with their mix of urban, rural, and agricultural populations, offer a unique demographic and economic profile. Understanding how individuals in these areas plan their finances and make investment choices is essential for designing inclusive and effective financial strategies. Despite the importance of such insights, there is limited empirical research focused specifically on these regions.
This study aims to bridge this research gap by analyzing the financial planning behavior and investment preferences of individuals in East and West Godavari districts. It further investigates the impact of demographic variables on investment decisions using statistical tools such as descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and ANOVA. The findings of this research are expected to contribute valuable insights for policymakers, financial institutions, and educators to promote better financial inclusion and literacy.
Statement of the Problem:
Despite the growing availability of diverse financial products and services in India, many individuals, especially in semi-urban and rural regions like the coastal districts of East Godavari and West Godavari, continue to rely heavily on traditional and low-risk investment avenues such as bank deposits and insurance policies. This limited diversification may hinder long-term financial growth and wealth creation.
Lusardi and Mitchell (2014) presented a broader perspective on how financial literacy affects saving and investment behavior globally. Their findings support the view that targeted financial education initiatives can lead to more effective financial planning and asset allocation.
In regional studies, Mishra and Singh (2011) in Odisha and Somasundaram and Padmaja (2015) in Tamil Nadu found similar patterns of risk-averse behavior among salaried individuals, with a preference for bank deposits and insurance policies. These preferences were strongly influenced by cultural and regional values, suggesting that localized financial education strategies are essential.
Desigan et al. (2006) explored the investment preferences of women investors and found that security, trust, and long-term value were primary decision factors. Their study resonates with this paper’s findings on gender-based differences in financial preferences in East and West Godavari districts.
Further, Gambhir and Kapoor (2013) and Dangi and Kumar (2013) observed that while mutual funds and equity markets are gradually gaining popularity, there remains a trust deficit among conservative investors. This aligns with the findings of the current study where traditional instruments like bank deposits and insurance dominate the investment landscape.
Pandian and Savarimuthu (2012) added psychological insights to the field, suggesting that personality traits and behavioral biases often override rational financial planning. Their work underscores the need for behavioral finance frameworks in evaluating investor decisions.
Lastly, Rao (2012) in a study in Hyderabad found that urban investors are more open to financial innovation, such as SIPs, ULIPs, and online trading platforms, as compared to semi-urban or rural investors, indicating the influence of geography and technology penetration on investment preferences.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:
The main objectives of the present study are :
Selection of Sample: The data needed for the study is collected from the select target respondents of in the Coastal Districts of East and West Godavari Andhra Pradesh. The target respondents are the rural households of age 18 or above. The data was collected from a total of 39 Mandals (East Godavari 19 and West Godavari 20) Coastal districts of East and West Godavari of Andhra Pradesh.
Data Collection: The data needed for the study is collected from both primary and secondary sources. The secondary sources include the reports published by the financial market regulators and other institutions in the primary market, websites of Government of Andhra Pradesh.
Sampling Design: The stratified random sampling technique is used to collect information from the target respondents. The population from which the sample is drawn is divided into different mandals based on population of the East and West Godavari Andhra Pradesh. Sample Size: The total sample size is 170 from East and West Godavari of Andhra Pradesh.
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION:
Table 1: Source from primary data Socio and economic factors
|
Demographic Variable |
Category |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Age |
20–30 years |
56 |
32.90% |
|
31–40 years |
52 |
30.60% |
|
|
41–50 years |
39 |
22.90% |
|
|
51 and above |
23 |
13.50% |
|
|
Gender |
Male |
115 |
67.60% |
|
Female |
55 |
32.40% |
|
|
Education |
Undergraduate |
75 |
44.10% |
|
Postgraduate |
65 |
38.20% |
|
|
Others |
30 |
17.60% |
|
|
Occupation |
Private Job |
52 |
30.60% |
|
Government Employee |
28 |
16.50% |
|
|
Self-employed |
45 |
26.50% |
|
|
Student/Retired |
45 |
26.50% |
Graph 1: Socio and economic factors
Table 2: Source from primary data Investment Preferences
|
Investment Avenue |
Respondents |
Percentage |
|
Bank/Post Office Deposits |
60 |
35.30% |
|
Insurance Policies |
40 |
23.50% |
|
Real Estate |
20 |
11.80% |
|
Mutual Funds |
18 |
10.60% |
|
Stock Market |
15 |
8.80% |
|
Gold/Bullion |
10 |
5.90% |
|
Others |
7 |
4.10% |
Graph 2: Investment Preferences
Table 3: Distribution by Age Group and Investment Avenue
|
Age Group |
Bank/PO Deposits |
Insurance |
Real Estate |
Mutual Funds |
Stock Market |
Gold/Bullion |
Others |
Total |
|
|
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
|
|
20–30 years |
15 (26.8%) |
10 (17.9%) |
5 (8.9%) |
12 (21.4%) |
9 (16.1%) |
3 (5.4%) |
2 (3.6%) |
56 |
|
31–40 years |
22 (42.3%) |
12 (23.1%) |
7 (13.5%) |
6 (11.5%) |
3 (5.8%) |
2 (3.8%) |
0 (0.0%) |
52 |
|
41–50 years |
14 (35.9%) |
10 (25.6%) |
6 (15.4%) |
2 (5.1%) |
2 (5.1%) |
3 (7.7%) |
2 (5.1%) |
39 |
|
51 and above |
9 (39.1%) |
8 (34.8%) |
2 (8.7%) |
1 (4.3%) |
1 (4.3%) |
2 (8.7%) |
0 (0.0%) |
23 |
|
Total (n = 170) |
60 (35.3%) |
40 (23.5%) |
20 (11.8%) |
18 (10.6%) |
15 (8.8%) |
10 (5.9%) |
7 (4.1%) |
170 |
Interpretation: Younger respondents (20–30 years) show higher interest in market-based investments like Mutual Funds (21.4%) and Stock Market (16.1%), suggesting greater risk tolerance and return expectation. Middle-aged groups (31–50 years) prefer Bank Deposits (35–42%) and Insurance, indicating a balanced approach between risk and safety. Older respondents (51+) overwhelmingly choose safe avenues like Bank/PO Deposits (39.1%) and Insurance (34.8%), reflecting a conservative financial strategy aimed at capital preservation.
Investment in Real Estate peaks among those aged 31–50 years, a typical phase for asset-building in life.
Table 4: Distribution of selection of investment avenues and Education
|
Financial Avenue |
Undergraduate (Freq./%) |
Postgraduate (Freq./%) |
Others (Freq./%) |
Total |
|
Bank/PO Deposits |
28 / 37.3% |
20 / 30.8% |
12 / 40.0% |
60 |
|
Insurance Policies |
18 / 24.0% |
15 / 23.1% |
7 / 23.3% |
40 |
|
Real Estate |
8 / 10.7% |
6 / 9.2% |
6 / 20.0% |
20 |
|
Mutual Funds |
7 / 9.3% |
8 / 12.3% |
3 / 10.0% |
18 |
|
Stock Market |
5 / 6.7% |
8 / 12.3% |
2 / 6.7% |
15 |
|
Gold/Bullion |
5 / 6.7% |
5 / 7.7% |
0 / 0.0% |
10 |
|
Others |
4 / 5.3% |
3 / 4.6% |
0 / 0.0% |
7 |
|
Total |
75 / 100% |
65 / 100% |
30 / 100% |
170 |
Interpretation:
Undergraduates most frequently choose Bank/PO Deposits, followed by Insurance Policies.
Postgraduates are more diversified, showing relatively higher interest in Stock Market and Mutual Funds. Others (those with less formal education) overwhelmingly prefer Bank Deposits and Real Estate, with negligible participation in higher-risk avenues like Stock Market or Mutual Funds. This suggests education level positively correlates with diversification and willingness to take financial risks.
Table 5: Distribution Investment Avenue Selection and Occupation (in %)
|
Investment Avenue |
Private Job (%) |
Government Employee (%) |
Self-Employed (%) |
Student/Retired (%) |
|
Bank/PO Deposits |
32.7 |
35.7 |
37.8 |
36.4 |
|
Insurance Policies |
25 |
28.6 |
22.2 |
20.5 |
|
Real Estate |
11.5 |
10.7 |
13.3 |
13.6 |
|
Mutual Funds |
11.5 |
14.3 |
8.9 |
6.8 |
|
Stock Market |
7.7 |
3.6 |
6.7 |
6.8 |
|
Gold/Bullion |
5.8 |
3.6 |
6.7 |
9.1 |
|
Others |
5.8 |
3.6 |
4.4 |
6.8 |
Interpretation: Preferred by 37.8% of Self-Employed, followed closely by Government Employees (35.7%) and Student/Retired (36.4%). The second most preferred option, especially by Government Employees (28.6%) and Private Job holders (25.0%).Gaining moderate interest among Self-Employed (13.3%) and Student/Retired (13.6%).More popular among Government Employees (14.3%) and Private Job holders (11.5%). Least favored across the board, particularly low among Government Employees (3.6%).Slightly more favored by Student/Retired (9.1%), possibly due to traditional preferences or as a hedge against inflation.
Chi-square Analysis:
Chi-square Test: Chi-square tests were conducted to determine the association between demographic variables (Age, Gender, Education, Occupation) and investment preferences. The table below summarizes the Chi-square values and significance levels:
Table 6: Chi-square Test Results by Demographic Variable
|
Demographic Variable |
Investment Avenue |
Chi-square Value |
Degrees of Freedom |
p-value |
Result |
|
Age |
All Categories |
21.76 |
18 |
0.24 |
Not Significant |
|
Gender |
All Categories |
13.45 |
6 |
0.037 |
Significant |
|
Education |
All Categories |
22.18 |
12 |
0.035 |
Significant |
|
Occupation |
All Categories |
19.62 |
15 |
0.186 |
Not Significant |
The Chi-square test indicates a significant association between Gender and Education with investment preferences (p < 0.05).
ANOVA TEST:
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine the effect of education level on investment preference scores. The results are presented below:
Table 7: Chi-square Test Results by Demographic Variable
|
Source of Variation |
Sum of Squares (SS) |
Degrees of Freedom (df) |
Mean Square (MS) |
F-value |
p-value |
Result |
|
Between Groups |
18.76 |
2 |
9.38 |
4.21 |
0.017 |
Significant |
|
Within Groups |
369.12 |
167 |
2.21 |
|||
|
Total |
387.88 |
169 |
The ANOVA test indicates a statistically significant difference in investment preferences based on education level (F = 4.21, p < 0.05). This suggests that education influences the choice of investment avenues.
FINDINGS:
Vii. Awareness and accessibility significantly affect investment choices.
SUGGESTIONS:
The study reveals a gradual shift from traditional to modern investment avenues in East and West Godavari districts of Andhra Pradesh state, influenced heavily by demographic factors. There is a pressing need to improve financial awareness and infrastructure to foster better financial inclusion. And also this study provides insights that can help financial planners and institutions create targeted financial products and awareness campaigns.