1.1 Rise of Conscious Consumption

Conscious consumption has been brought to the world markets by the niche activism of the last two decades, to mainstream the activism. Consumers are starting to be more aware of the reality that the character of the purchasing choices they are making is not merely an economic undertaking, but it is one founded on the choices that have ethical, social, and environmental consequences (Islam et al., 2024). The rise in consciousness of climate change, the depletion of biodiversity, the exploitation of labor, and the widening social gap have created the concept of responsibility as an element of the buying criteria of consumers. In that regard, consumption has turned into a civic identity, a form of participation in the formation of the kind of world people want to inhabit (Yang et al., 2022). The change is a cultural reimagination as the participants of the market who were once in a dominant position to dictate the terms of engagement are becoming more vulnerable to the value-based needs of the consumers (Issock Issock et al., 2023).

1.2 Evidence of Consumer-Driven Transformation

The recent data captures the level of this change. A 2023 study by Deloitte discovered that about 60 percent of Gen Z and Millennial consumers reported boycotting a brand they thought was not environmentally friendly. Similarly, a study by Global Sustainability Report released by Ismail in 2023 established that 78 percent of consumers globally value sustainability highly when used to select a product, and that one in three consumers would be willing to pay more to use ethical and environmentally sustainable brands. These findings explain why the functional utility is not the only factor that determines the purchasing decision, but also identity and the positioning of morals (Alagarsamy et al., 2021). The younger generation has a two-pronged lifestyle and political agency on consumer behavior, and that is why it makes them more influential on business practices and industry standards.

1.3 Implications for Marketing Practices

The new conscientious consumption pressures are requiring firms to re-strategize their marketing strategy. The old-fashioned methods of price warfare, product distinction, or life dream are being forced out by new solutions (Haider et al., 2022). Companies increasingly adopt eco-labels, carbon disclosures, and fair-trade certifications as visible signals of trust. The marketing is no longer constructed on the basis of the theoretical aspiration, but rather on the evidence-based narrative focused on the adoption of renewable energy, sustainable supply chain, or community development (Agu et al., 2022). Online channels increase the intensity of these pressures since consumers are able to call the statements of the corporation and to fact-check online. Marketing is not a role of promotion, thus, but rather a frontline position of accountability and trustworthiness on behalf of the stakeholders (Kautish and Sharma, 2020).

1.4 Problems and Greenwashing: A Threat

With all these changes, it is clear that companies have a lot more to accomplish to ensure that they are able to keep pace with the conscious consumers. The most critical aspect of sustainability, which is overrated or unreasonable, is greenwashing (Rustam et al., 2020). According to a 2022 study by Rajagopal, more than 40 percent of claims that corporations reviewed were not premised on credible evidence. Such practices not only kill the confidence of consumers but also cast into doubt any attempt to be actually sustainable, as a danger of being dismissed as mere rhetoric. It is thus the responsibility of the businesses to strike a balance between turning sustainability into business and overemphasizing it in communications. The absence of this balance can be accompanied by the threat of reputational losses, loss of competitiveness, and the loss of long-term trust (Wei et al., 2024).

1.5 Research Gap

Although literature on ethical consumerism and corporate social responsibility (CSR) is not lacking, the two topics are often studied separately. Psychological motives, including identity formation, selfless behavior, or ethical responsibility, are demonstrated in the consumer study (Kasza et al., 2022), and the CSR literature is concerned with reporting frameworks and governance practices (Zhang et al., 2025). The neglected area is an integrative one, which connects micro-level consumer expectations to the macro-level marketing policies and ultimately business sustainability performance. To top this, the issue of whether consumer-led initiatives are resulting in systemic shifts within corporate paradigms or are shallow gestures confined to niche markets is still open.

1.6 Theoretical and Practical Significance

This gap should be bridged. Theoretically, conscious consumption discredits the transactional paradigms since it would make consumers the creators of the corporate practice, instead of the consumers of the marketing appeals. In practice, companies that, in fact, meet the needs of their clients can be singled out in the competition, gain socially responsible investors, and be strong when the controlling authorities act (Islam et al., 2024). Conversely, superficial or inconsistent responses invite skepticism and reputational decline. The discovery of conscious consumption as a structural reenactment of consumer-business relationship locates the study in the acute debates of sustainability, marketing creativity, and long-term competitiveness.

1.7 Variability and Contextual Nuances

The other argument that should not be ignored relates to the fact that conscious consumption cannot be uniform in all situations. Cultural values, level of income, and the direction of regional development determine consumer expectations, and the reactions of the companies are predetermined by the industry-specific factors and resources (Nguyen et al., 2019). Conscious consumption is a mistake to view as a monolithic move. Instead, it is to be analyzed as a multifaceted phenomenon, the influence of which is determined by the situation. The research will contribute to the creation of a delicate exploration of the phenomenon using the interdisciplinary methodology that involves marketing, consumer psychology, and sustainability research.

1.8 Objectives of the Study

It is on this background that the present research study intends to investigate the influence of conscious consumption on the marketing and business sustainability in a holistic and multipronged manner. Specifically, the research will be targeted at examining how the issue of sustainable and responsible product demand among consumers is reshaping the marketing practice, particularly in the areas of communication, branding, and product innovation. It also addresses the role of such strategic changes in business sustainability in the long-term in terms of competitiveness, organisational resilience, and stakeholder trust. Finally, the study will assist in illuminating the opportunities as well as the problems that the companies encounter in their effort to align their operations to consumer-led needs. To achieve these purposes, the study may be helpful to the theory in that it defines the chain of actions between consumer behavior and corporate adaptation, and to practice in that it gives data on how the companies can be managed in the dynamic environment of the sustainability-oriented markets.

Issock Issock et al. (2023) examined the issue of organic food consumption and affirmed that sustainable purchases lead to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In their work, they point out that conscious consumption is not only an ecological responsibility but also an individual life satisfaction. This implies that marketing can focus on individual and group value, positioning sustainability as a means to attaining a higher quality of life and increased value to society as a whole.

Zhang et al. (2025) examined the concept of eco-consciousness in tourism and discovered that psychological orientations with sustainability are a great influence on the reaction to green marketing campaigns. Tourists were more open to destinations that positioned themselves on conservation and social responsibility. Following Issock et al. (2023), this article brings out the connection between consumer psychology and brand credibility, stating that effective marketing needs to integrate environmental stories that appeal to values and experiences.

Islam et al. (2024) researched high-end restaurants, demonstrating that the sustainability awareness and social impact together determine the green purchase intentions. Their findings indicate that sustainable consumption may serve as a moral action and a status symbol at the same time. This duality implies that marketers of prestige-oriented industries have to strike a balance between appeals to ethics and appeals to identity and lifestyle, and demonstrate how conscious consumption and social positioning are related to each other.

Rajagopal (2020) noted that conscious consumption brings about the need to shift the paradigm of marketing in developing economies. He argued that marketing needed to move past transactional promotion to advocacy-based promotion and that sustainability needed to be at the core of business models. Rajagopal puts conscious consumption in the larger governance and socio-economic contexts to present the individual choice as a catalyst for systemic change in corporate practices.

Haider et al. (2022) offered a survey of almost half a century of sustainable consumption literature and found that although marketing is central, the literature is disjointed. They noted that consumer motivations and firm-level strategies have been researched independently, restricting knowledge of their interaction. Their demand to have integrative frameworks points to an obvious research gap, supporting the view that conscious consumption needs to be studied as a system-level factor between personal actions and organizational performance (Rajagopal, 2020).

Tan et al. (2022) examined how brand image and trust mediate the impact of green marketing and discovered that credibility plays a vital role in the process of mediating the effect of sustainability campaigns on purchase behavior. Their works emphasize that without actual practices, green marketing is prone to consumer cynicism, as it has happened with the incoherent strategies of Haider et al. (2022). The findings point to authenticity and transparency as non-negotiable elements of sustainability communication.

Kaur et al. (2022) tested green purchasing intentions in developing countries and discovered that pro-environmental attitudes are effective predictors of purchase behavior, especially by younger and educated consumers. Their research adds to Tan et al. (2022) by demonstrating that values-based marketing can work when it is congruent with credibility, yet it also warns that the translation of attitudes into real behavior may be constrained by economic forces, which underpin arguments about conscious consumption.

Mandarić et al. (2022) researched the fashion industry and established that sustainability efforts like recycled fabrics and clear supply chains result in stronger loyalty and buying habits. The example of fashion, which is hated due to unethical practices, shows the dangers of consumer backlash and the prospects for companies that accept reforms. This work demonstrates behavioral change, which supports the transformative power of consumer-driven sustainability, as opposed to intention-focused studies such as Kaur et al. (2022).

Bager and Lambin (2020) examined sustainability practices in the worldwide coffee industry and discovered that certifications and clear reporting not only added to competitiveness but also enhanced consumer loyalty. Their studies show that sustainability that is strategically integrated in businesses creates both reputational and financial gains. This fact supports the conceptual argument of Rajagopal (2020) but provides empirical support to the idea of structural integration of sustainability into business models.

Urbański and Ul Haque (2020) viewed the consumer attitudes towards greenwashing and demonstrated that not all of them can distinguish between genuine sustainability and fake statements. Such disbelief violates credibility and shows the weakness of credibility in sustainability marketing. Tan et al. (2022) find that their findings are different, placing emphasis on trust as a driver of effectiveness by arguing that credibility is easily destroyed by inauthentic practices, and it is a steady source of threat to firms.

These 10 marketing practices and business sustainability studies show that psychological orientations, social influence, identity, and values influence consumer preferences and also provide industry-wide change in fashion, food, tourism, and coffee. At the same time, the efficiency of marketing is defined in terms of trust, transparency, and structural integration of sustainability into business models.

Despite such revelations, there are contradictions. Consumers are more concerned with sustainability, and more cynical of marketing messages, and the economic or cultural environment may restrict the translation of pro-environmental attitudes to stable behavior. In addition, most of the studies have concentrated either on consumer-level motivation or the firm-level strategies, but have never really bridged the gap between the two. It subsequently generates the necessity of possessing integrative frameworks that can detail how conscious consumption can be converted into quantifiable sustainability measures for enterprises. Closing this divide, the current research investigates the proactive nature of conscious consumption in marketing activity and its contribution to the sustainability of the long-term business, and provides a complete picture of the value-driven consumption as a force in the marketplace and a pathfinder to social good.

3.1 Research Design

The study is grounded on a mixed-method case study to understand how conscious consumption would affect marketing practice and business sustainability. The parallel design was convergent to guarantee that the quantitative and the qualitative data were gathered and analysed independently and then combined. This design has been chosen because conscious consumption is a process that involves interactions between the attitudes of the individual consumer and those of the organization, and hence it was important to capture the two in the same period.

3.2 Data Sources and Sampling

3.2.1 Consumer Survey

The dataset was created through a systematic consumer survey conducted in three metropolitan areas with high exposure to sustainability-oriented markets. Respondents were recruited via a web-based research panel using stratified sampling for gender, age, and education. Eligibility required engagement in sustainable purchasing (e.g., organic foods, fair-trade drinks, eco-friendly clothes). Of 720 invitations, 512 valid responses were collected (71% response rate). The survey included demographics and constructs on willingness to pay for sustainable products, belief in sustainability claims, and brand transparency. Attitudinal variables (environmental responsibility, social influence) were measured on 5-point Likert scales. Established consumer behavior and green marketing scales were adapted, and a pilot with 40 respondents ensured clarity and reliability.

3.2.2 Case Studies

A case study of 5 multinational companies: food, fashion, retail, technology, and coffee industries was conducted. Companies were selected based on inclusion in global sustainability rankings and visible integration of sustainability in marketing campaigns. Data were collected through 12 semi-structured interviews with marketing executives (45–75 minutes each, recorded with consent and transcribed verbatim) and through documentary analysis of sustainability reports, promotional campaigns, and product disclosures.

3.2.3 Secondary Data

The third one was secondary data through international sustainability indices, market-research reports, and consumer-trend studies. These external data were used to give context to survey findings and to test the claims of firms as disclosed by them.

3.3 Quantitative Analysis

Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used to analyze survey data. Descriptive statistics provided an overview of respondent demographics and engagement with sustainable consumption. Correlations and group comparisons were conducted to examine relationships between environmental attitudes, trust in corporate claims, and willingness to pay for sustainable products, while controlling for age, gender, income, and education.

3.4 Qualitative Analysis

The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis with NVivo. A deductive coding scheme was developed from themes in the literature (e.g., transparency, authenticity, greenwashing), while additional themes were generated inductively. Two independent coders analyzed transcripts and corporate documents, achieving an inter-coder agreement of 0.82 (Cohen’s Kappa); disagreements were discussed and resolved. Ethical protocols were followed, including informed consent, confidentiality, anonymization, and reflexive note-taking to account for researcher positionality.

3.5 Integration of Findings

Findings were integrated at the interpretation level by comparing survey results with case studies and documentary data. Triangulation revealed both congruence (e.g., consumer emphasis on authenticity and company emphasis on transparent reporting) and tension (e.g., consumer distrust of claims versus corporate confidence in green branding). This convergent, multi-source approach ensured results reflected both consumer perspectives and organizational practices.

4.1 Survey Findings

The consumer survey yielded 512 viable answers in three metropolitan areas. The demographic landscape was balanced with most of the respondents falling into the age category of 25-40, and a large percentage being university qualified. Table 1 shows the demographics of respondents.

Table 1. Demographic Profile of Survey Respondents (N = 512)

The respondents said that they often deal with sustainable purchasing, especially organic food and drinks, environmentally friendly clothing, or fair-trade coffee. Less common in technology and retailing was sustainable purchasing. The mean consumer attitudes to sustainability and purchasing behavior are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Consumer Attitudes toward Sustainability and Purchasing Behavior (N = 512)

There was a general positive consumer attitude, moderate willingness to pay, and strong environmental attitude. Nevertheless, the degree of trust in corporate sustainability differed significantly among respondents. The survey scales proved to be reliable enough, with all the constructors scoring above the recommended value of 0.70 in terms of Cronbach's alpha. A correlation analysis showed that willingness to pay was positively correlated with environmental attitudes and perceived transparency, whereas trust in sustainability claims was strongly correlated with purchase intention and brand loyalty. Figure 1 shows the correlation between the important consumer attitudes and purchase intention.

Figure 1. Relationship between Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intention

4.2 Case Study Findings

The five case studies showed that sustainability was always a part of marketing approaches, but the methods depended on the sector. Food and coffee companies depended on certifications like Fair Trade and Organic, and reporting supply chain practices in detail. The technology companies focused on energy efficiency, renewable energy commitments, and performance measures. Fashion businesses were concentrated on consumer-facing initiatives like take-back programs, recycling campaigns, and eco-labeled product lines, and retailers had invested in digital channels to tackle sourcing and product traceability. The results of the sustainability marketing practices identified in the five sectors are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Sustainability Marketing Practices across Sectors

The conclusions were based on 12 semi-structured interviews (45-75 minutes) with marketing executives, along with documentary sources of evidence, including reports and promotional materials. In all these interviews, managers noted transparency as a key factor to ensure credibility. Several recognized reputational risks in regards to being accused of greenwashing. The frequency of key sustainability themes as cited in executive interviews is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Frequency of Sustainability Themes in Executive Interviews

4.3 Secondary Data Triangulation

The external validation of the survey and case study findings was offered by the secondary datasets. The case study firms were included in the list of known leaders in their industries by sustainability indices such as the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) database. Survey findings were also reflected in consumer trend reports, where Millennials and Gen Z were found to be the most open to spending on sustainable products.

Meanwhile, the differences arose between corporate reports and independent assessments. In company disclosures, advancement in carbon reduction and supply chain reform were frequently stated more optimistically than in third-party analysis. Figure 3 is a comparison of corporate-reported achievements to independent assessments across sectors.

Figure 3. Comparison of Corporate Sustainability Claims and Independent Assessments

4.4 Integrated Findings

In all three sources of data, there were recurrent patterns and significant divergences. The outcomes of the surveys proved that willingness to purchase sustainable products depended on trust and transparency as the key determinants. Case study evidence indicated that companies tried aggressively to respond to this demand based on certifications, disclosures, and consumer-facing campaigns. Secondary information supported the fact that sustainability has become a mainstream requirement, especially among younger consumers.

But divergence was also prominent. According to the survey, people were skeptical about what the corporations say, whereas the case studies revealed that the companies continue to place a strong emphasis on branding and symbolic campaigns. The secondary evaluations also pointed to discrepancies between the stated accomplishment and real progress. Collectively, these findings indicate that despite the fact that conscious consumption has evolved into a consumer behavior and corporate imperative, the complete alignment of consumer expectations, marketing practices, and business outcomes is still not full.

The findings of this study demonstrate the multidimensional relationship between corporate sustainability practice and consumer expectations. Survey data revealed that while pro-environmental attitudes are widespread, they do not automatically result in sustainable purchasing. Instead, willingness to pay premiums was strongly conditioned by belief in corporate claims and perceptions of transparency, supporting Tan et al. (2022), who argue that credibility plays a critical role in green marketing. Case studies confirmed this dynamic: firms sought legitimacy through certifications, disclosures, and consumer-facing campaigns, yet managers acknowledged that allegations of greenwashing remain a constant reputational threat. Independent benchmarks provided perspective, showing that even sustainability leaders often report progress more positively than external evaluations suggest, particularly in carbon reduction and supply chain reform. Together, the results suggest that conscious consumption is driving business practice and that it further generates a continuous tension between market promises and measurable outcomes.

This study will have some theoretical contributions. First, the fact that values do not fully predict behavior without credible communication is shown, which explains the consumer well-being viewpoint developed by Pop et al. (2020). Second, it concentrates on the fragmentation observed by Haider et al. (2022) by integrating consumer-level data and firm-level strategies into a systemic approach. Third, it contributes to the discussion of authenticity and greenwashing by demonstrating that the lack of alignment between corporate messages and external audit compromises credibility, which is also in line with Papadopoulou et al. (2022). This also contributes to advocacy-based appeals presented by Rajagopal (2020) but empirically proves that symbolic promises are not enough to please consumers who require confirmation. In sum, the research contributes to theoretical debates of conscious consumption as a phenomenon that is shaped by individual psychology, business strategy, and institutional control.

The practice implications are obvious. Companies can no longer count on the rhetorical sustainability, but they need to show realness by taking action that can be verified. The introduction of mechanisms like certifications, transparent reporting, and traceability proved to be credible-building tools, which is correlated with Younas et al. (2023), who discovered that authenticity creates loyalty. These were strategies in context, as sectoral analysis bears witness. The fashion companies concentrated on customer-driven projects and storytelling, which aligns with what Sheth and Parvatiyar (2021) say about fashion and sustainability. Food and coffee companies were building their basis of legality on certifications, technological firms were also working on being efficient and using renewable energy, and the retailers were integrating the communication of their supply chains with internet communication. These conclusions indicate that there is no homogeneity of conscious consumption but that which is mediated by the circumstances of the industry. It also encourages under-promising: the reputational harm of greenwashing can negate decades of brand-building, as Mohammad et al. (2021) stress.

Conscious consumption functions as an opportunity and limitation at a larger business level. Governance and supply chain sustainability may also be a competitive edge that can be aligned with Machova et al. (2022), who concluded that systemic integration enhances loyalty and performance. However, frequent discrepancies between company reports and third-party analyses indicate the difficulty of turning promises into outcomes. Such conscious consumption is a disciplinary move in making firms close credibility gaps, or they can lose their legitimacy in the face of more skeptical consumers. There are a number of limitations to be mentioned. The survey targeted metropolitan consumers, where sustainability discourse is prominent, limiting generalization to rural or price-sensitive populations. Case studies focused on multinationals with substantial resources, leaving questions about small and medium enterprises. In addition, reliance on self-reported data introduces social desirability bias, a common challenge in consumer studies (Shabbir et al., 2020). These limitations suggest future research directions: broadening geographic and socio-economic scope, including SMEs, and employing longitudinal designs to track whether consumer trust evolves as transparency tools expand. Cross-national comparisons would also clarify how cultural differences shape consumer expectations and corporate responses.

The evidence indicates that conscious consumption is transforming consumer markets and corporate strategy, though its influence is conditional. Values matter, but only when matched by credibility. By integrating consumer attitudes, corporate practices, and independent benchmarks, this research contributes to a comprehensive understanding of sustainability expectation negotiations in the marketplace. Firms that align rhetoric with verifiable action can build loyalty and competitive resilience, while those relying on symbolic claims risk reputational decline and strategic vulnerability.

This study examines the impact of conscious consumption on marketing activities and the sustainability of business. The results indicate that although the popularity of pro-environmental values is growing, it can only influence buying behavior when the corporate sustainability claims are seen as credible and transparent. Case studies have revealed that companies are striving to meet such expectations through certifications, disclosures, and consumer-facing campaigns, although gaps between reported improvements and independent assessments indicate that challenges to maintaining credibility still exist. These results indicate that conscious consumption is both a source and a constraint: it forces companies to integrate sustainability in their operation and in their control to an increased extent, yet it also exposes them to reputational losses when their symbolic behavior goes beyond their real achievements. By relating consumer psychology and organizational practice and independent standards, the piece presents theoretical premises and thereby contributes to the authenticity/greenwashing debate. Practically, it emphasizes that it is not rhetoric but verifiable actions that are the determinant of long-term competitiveness. In addition, future studies will address consumers in non-urban areas, the reaction of smaller and medium-sized businesses to sustainability pressures, and longitudinal and cross-national designs to enable greater understanding of consumer trust. Such concerns will not only be solved to assist in the development of scholarly debate, but also assist businesses and policymakers in reacting to the new demands of the markets that are sensitive to sustainability.

1. Agu, A. G., Etuk, S. G., & Madichie, N. O. (2022). Exploring the role of sustainability-oriented marketing education in promoting consciousness for sustainable consumption. Sustainability, 14(13), 8077. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138077
2. Alagarsamy, S., Mehrolia, S., & Mathew, S. (2021). How green consumption value affects green consumer behaviour: The mediating role of consumer attitudes towards sustainable food logistics practices. Vision, 25(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920977986
3. Bager, S. L., & Lambin, E. F. (2020). Sustainability strategies by companies in the global coffee sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3555–3570. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2596
4. Haider, M., Shannon, R., & Moschis, G. P. (2022). Sustainable consumption research and the role of marketing: A review of the literature (1976–2021). Sustainability, 14(7), 3999. https://doi.org/10.3390 /su14073999
5. Islam, J. U., Thomas, G., & Albishri, N. A. (2024). From status to sustainability: How social influence and sustainability consciousness drive green purchase intentions in luxury restaurants. Acta Psychologica, 251, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104595
6. Ismail, I. J. (2023). The role of technological absorption capacity, environmental orientation, and green marketing in enhancing business sustainability: Evidence from fast-moving consumer goods in Tanzania. Technological Sustainability, 2(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/TECHS-04-2022-0018
7. Issock Issock, P. B., Mpinganjira, M., & Roberts-Lombard, M. (2023). Beyond sustainable consumption practices: Linking organic food consumption to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Appetite, 188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106633
8. Kasza, G., Veflen, N., Scholderer, J., Münter, L., Fekete, L., Csenki, E. Z., Dorkó, A., Szakos, D., & Izsó, T. (2022). Conflicting issues of sustainable consumption and food safety: Risky consumer behaviors in reducing food waste and plastic packaging. Foods, 11(21), 3520. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213520
9. Kaur, B., Gangwar, V. P., & Dash, G. (2022). Green marketing strategies, environmental attitude, and green buying intention: A multi-group analysis in an emerging economy context. Sustainability, 14(10), 6107. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106107
10. Kautish, P., & Sharma, R. (2020). Determinants of pro‐environmental behavior and environmentally conscious consumer behavior: An empirical investigation from an emerging market. Business Strategy & Development, 3(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.82
11. Machová, R., Ambrus, R., Zsigmond, T., & Bakó, F. (2022). The impact of green marketing on consumer behavior in the market of palm oil products. Sustainability, 14(3), 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031364
12. Mandarić, D., Hunjet, A., & Vuković, D. (2022). The impact of fashion brand sustainability on consumer purchasing decisions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(4), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15040176
13. Mohammad, J., Quoquab, F., & Mohamed Sadom, N. Z. (2021). Mindful consumption of second-hand clothing: The role of eWOM, attitude, and consumer engagement. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 25(3), 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-05-2020-0080
14. Nguyen, N., Nguyen, H. V., Nguyen, P. T., Tran, V. T., Nguyen, H. N., Nguyen, T. M. N., Cao, T. K., & Nguyen, T. H. (2019). Some key factors affecting consumers' intentions to purchase functional foods: A case study of functional yogurts in Vietnam. Foods, 9(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ foods9010024
15. Papadopoulou, M., Papasolomou, I., & Thrassou, A. (2022). Exploring the level of sustainability awareness among consumers within the fast-fashion clothing industry: A dual business and consumer perspective. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 32(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-04-2021-0061
16. Pop, R. A., Săplăcan, Z., & Alt, M. A. (2020). Social media goes green—The impact of social media on green cosmetics purchase motivation and intention. Information, 11(9), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390 /info11090447
17. (2020). Conscious consumption and marketing strategy. In Sustainable businesses in developing economies: Socio-economic and governance perspectives (pp. 179–199). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/97 8-3-030-51681-9_7
18. Rustam, A., Wang, Y., & Zameer, H. (2020). Environmental awareness, firm sustainability exposure, and green consumption behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122016
19. Shabbir, M. S., Bait Ali Sulaiman, M. A., Hasan Al-Kumaim, N., Mahmood, A., & Abbas, M. (2020). Green marketing approaches and their impact on consumer behavior towards the environment—A study from the UAE. Sustainability, 12(21), 8977. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218977
20. Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (2021). Sustainable marketing: Market-driving, not market-driven. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146720961836
21. Tan, Z., Sadiq, B., Bashir, T., Mahmood, H., & Rasool, Y. (2022). Investigating the impact of green marketing components on purchase intention: The mediating role of brand image and brand trust. Sustainability, 14(10), 5939. https://doi.org/10.3390 /su14105939
22. Urbański, M., & Ul Haque, A. (2020). Are you environmentally conscious enough to differentiate between greenwashed and sustainable items? A global consumer's perspective. Sustainability, 12(5), 1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051786
23. Wei, Q., Bao, A., Lv, D., Liu, S., Chen, S., Chi, Y., & Zuo, J. (2024). The influence of message frame and product type on green consumer purchase decisions: An ERP study. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 23232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75056-2
24. Yang, X., Jiang, J., & Chen, S. C. (2022). Achieving sustainability: Determinants of conscious green purchasing behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1 002/bse.3245
25. Younas, N., Hossain, M. B., Syed, A., Ejaz, S., Ejaz, F., Jagirani, T. S., & Dunay, A. (2023). Green shared vision: A bridge between responsible leadership and green behavior under individual green values. Heliyon, 9(11), e21511. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.heliyon.2023.e21511
26. Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., & Zaman, U. (2025). Eco-consciousness in tourism: A psychological perspective on green marketing and consumer behavior. Acta Psychologica, 255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104951