Women-centric laws in India were originally enacted to address structural gender inequality, ensure protection from violence, and promote social justice for women. Over time, however, concerns have emerged regarding the unintended misuse of certain legal provisions, particularly those related to domestic violence, dowry harassment, and sexual offences. While such laws remain essential for safeguarding women’s rights, instances of false or exaggerated complaints have raised questions about procedural fairness, the presumption of innocence, and gender-neutral access to justice. This study critically examines the nature, extent, and implications of the misapplication of women-protective laws against men in India. Through doctrinal analysis, case-law review, and examination of empirical data, the paper explores how misuse affects men, families, and the justice system. It further evaluates judicial responses, policy debates, and the need for balanced legal reforms that preserve women’s protections while preventing wrongful criminalisation of men. The findings highlight the importance of evidence-based policy, gender-neutral legal safeguards, and strengthening institutional mechanisms to ensure that protective laws serve their intended purpose without enabling abuse